On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:49:38 +0530 Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > IMO, it's worth to note in man page.
> >
>
> Or the current patch for just ENOMEM is sufficient here and we just have
> to update the man page?
I think the "On success, process_madvise() returns the number of bytes
advised" behaviour sounds useful. But madvise() doesn't do that.
RETURN VALUE
On success, madvise() returns zero. On error, it returns -1 and errno
is set to indicate the error.
So why is it desirable in the case of process_madvise()?
And why was process_madvise() designed this way? Or was it
always simply an error in the manpage?
