Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2022/3/14 23:21, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> user_shm_lock forgets to set allowed to 0 when get_ucounts fails. So >>> the later user_shm_unlock might do the extra dec_rlimit_ucounts. Fix >>> this by resetting allowed to 0. >> >> This fix looks correct. But the ability for people to follow and read >> the code seems questionable. I saw in v1 of this patch Hugh originally >> misread the logic. >> >> Could we instead change the code to leave lock_limit at ULONG_MAX aka >> RLIM_INFINITY, leave initialized to 0, and not even need a special case >> of RLIM_INFINITY as nothing can be greater that ULONG_MAX? >> > > Many thanks for your advice. This looks good but it seems this results in different > behavior: When (memlock == LONG_MAX) && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK), we would fail now > while it will always success without this change. We should avoid this difference. > Or am I miss something? Maybe the origin patch is more suitable and > simple? Interesting. I think that is an unintended and necessary bug fix. When memlock == LONG_MAX that means inc_rlimit_ucounts failed. It either failed because at another level the limit was exceeded or because the counter wrapped. In either case it is not appropriate to succeed if inc_rlimit_ucounts detects a failure. Which is a long way of saying I think we really want the simplification because it found and fixed another bug as well. Without the simplification I don't think I will be confident the code is correct. Eric > Thanks. > >> Something like this? >> >> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c >> index 8f584eddd305..e7eabf5193ab 100644 >> --- a/mm/mlock.c >> +++ b/mm/mlock.c >> @@ -827,13 +827,12 @@ int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct ucounts *ucounts) >> >> locked = (size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK); >> - if (lock_limit == RLIM_INFINITY) >> - allowed = 1; >> - lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT; >> + if (lock_limit != RLIM_INFINITY) >> + lock_limit >>= PAGE_SHIFT; >> spin_lock(&shmlock_user_lock); >> memlock = inc_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked); >> >> - if (!allowed && (memlock == LONG_MAX || memlock > lock_limit) && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { >> + if ((memlock == LONG_MAX || memlock > lock_limit) && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) { >> dec_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked); >> goto out; >> } >> >>> >>> Fixes: d7c9e99aee48 ("Reimplement RLIMIT_MEMLOCK on top of ucounts") >>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v1->v2: >>> correct Fixes tag and collect Acked-by tag >>> Thanks Hugh for review! >>> --- >>> mm/mlock.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c >>> index 29372c0eebe5..efd2dd2943de 100644 >>> --- a/mm/mlock.c >>> +++ b/mm/mlock.c >>> @@ -733,6 +733,7 @@ int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct ucounts *ucounts) >>> } >>> if (!get_ucounts(ucounts)) { >>> dec_rlimit_ucounts(ucounts, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, locked); >>> + allowed = 0; >>> goto out; >>> } >>> allowed = 1; >> >> Eric >> . >>