On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That seems like a horrible idea, because there is no guarantee that
> the kernel will continue to use NR_ACTIVE_ANON and NR_ACTIVE_FILE
> internally in the future.
>
> What is exported to userspace must be somewhat independent of the
> specifics of how the kernel implements things internally.
Exactly, that's what I'm also interested in.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>