On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:07:49 +0100 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Abhishek reported that after patch [1], hotplug operations are
> taking ~double the expected time. [2]
>
> The reason behind is that the CPU callbacks that migrate_on_reclaim_init()
> sets always call set_migration_target_nodes() whenever a CPU is brought
> up/down.
> But we only care about numa nodes going from having cpus to become
> cpuless, and vice versa, as that influences the demotion_target order.
>
> We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead())
> that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in
> migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from
> vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state.
What I'm not getting here (as so often happens) is a sense of how badly
this affects our users. Does anyone actually hotplug frequently enough
to care?
If "yes" then I'm inclined to merge this up for 5.18 with a cc:stable.
Not for 5.17 because it's late and things are looking rather creaky
already.
And I'll add a
Fixes: 884a6e5d1f93b ("mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events")
which is that patch's fourth such bouquet.
