Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: add next_mz back if not reclaimed yet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:17:58AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Tue 08-03-22 01:20:47, Wei Yang wrote:
>> next_mz is removed from rb_tree, let's add it back if no reclaim has
>> been tried.
>
>Could you elaborate more why we need/want this?
>

Per my understanding, we add back the right most node even reclaim makes no
progress, so it is reasonable to add back a node if we didn't get a chance to
do reclaim on it.

It looks like we forget to add it back to the tree. Maybe Johannes know some
background why we don't add it back? 

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux