On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue 17-01-12 20:47:59, Hillf Danton wrote: >> If async order-O reclaim expected here, it is settled down when setting up scan >> control, with scan priority hacked to be zero. Other than that, deny of reclaim >> should be removed. > > Maybe I have misunderstood you but this is not right. The check is to > protect from the _global_ reclaim with order > 0 when we prevent from > memcg soft reclaim. > need to bear mm hog in this way? Thanks Hillf -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>