Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] x86/e820: Refactor range_update and range_remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/7/22, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Something I think would be really amazing here is if you could add KUnit
> tests here to exercise the corner cases and validate the changes. It
> should be pretty easy to add. Here's a quick example for the boilerplate
> and testing a bit of __e820__range_add():
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_E820_KUNIT_TEST
> #include <kunit/test.h>
>
> static void __init test_e820_range_add(struct kunit *context)
> {
> 	struct e820_table table;
> 	u32 full;
>
> 	full = ARRAY_SIZE(table.entries);
> 	/* Add last entry. */
> 	table->nr_entries = full - 1;
> 	__e820__range_add(&table, 0, 15, 0);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(table->nr_entries, full)
> 	/* Skip new entry when full. */
> 	__e820__range_add(&table, 0, 15, 0);
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(table->nr_entries, full)
> }
>
> static void __init test_e820_update(struct kunit *context)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> static struct kunit_case __refdata e820_test_cases[] = {
>         KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_range_add),
>         KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_update),
> 	...
>         {}
> };
>
> static struct kunit_suite e820_test_suite = {
>         .name = "e820",
>         .test_cases = e820_test_cases,
> };
>
> kunit_test_suites(&e820_test_suite);
> #endif

I almost got it. Although when added the tests I have a warning
when compiling, because KUnit doens't want to deal with __init things:

    WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.data+0x26800): Section mismatch in
reference from the variable __UNIQUE_ID_array286 to the variable
.init.data:e820_test_suite
    The variable __UNIQUE_ID_array286 references
    the variable __initdata e820_test_suite
    If the reference is valid then annotate the
    variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
    *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console

I need to test __init functions. I couldn't find any other similar
cases in existant code. Is there a nice way to solve this?

I'm adding the file that contains the tests just in case..


#include <kunit/test.h>

#include <asm/e820/api.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>

#define KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, entry, _addr, _size, _type,           \
				   _crypto_capable)                            \
	do {                                                                   \
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), (entry).addr, (_addr));                \
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), (entry).size, (_size));                \
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), (entry).type, (_type));                \
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ((test), (entry).crypto_capable,                \
				(_crypto_capable));                            \
	} while (0)

struct e820_table test_table __initdata;

static void __init test_e820_range_add(struct kunit *test)
{
        u32 full;

        full = ARRAY_SIZE(test_table.entries);
        /* Add last entry. */
        test_table.nr_entries = full - 1;
        __e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, 15, 0, 0);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_table.nr_entries, full);
        /* Skip new entry when full. */
        __e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, 15, 0, 0);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_table.nr_entries, full);
}

static void __init test_e820_range_update(struct kunit *test)
{
	u64 entry_size = 15;
	u64 updated_size = 0;
	/* Initialize table */
	test_table.nr_entries = 0;
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size * 2, entry_size,
			  E820_TYPE_ACPI, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	updated_size = __e820__range_update(&test_table, 0, entry_size * 2,
					    E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_TYPE_RESERVED);
	/* The first 2 regions were updated */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, updated_size, entry_size * 2);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, entry_size,
				   E820_TYPE_RESERVED, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], entry_size,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_RESERVED,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[2], entry_size * 2,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	updated_size = __e820__range_update(&test_table, 0, entry_size * 3,
					    E820_TYPE_RESERVED, E820_TYPE_RAM);
	/* Only the first 2 regions were updated */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, updated_size, entry_size * 2);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, entry_size,
				   E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], entry_size,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[2], entry_size * 2,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
}

static void __init test_e820_range_remove(struct kunit *test)
{
	u64 entry_size = 15;
	u64 removed_size = 0;

	struct e820_entry_updater updater = {
		.should_update = remover__should_update,
		.update = remover__update,
		.new = remover__new
	};

	struct e820_remover_data data = {
		.check_type = true,
		.old_type = E820_TYPE_RAM
	};

	/* Initialize table */
	test_table.nr_entries = 0;
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size * 2, entry_size,
			  E820_TYPE_ACPI, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	/*
	 * Need to use __e820__handle_range_update because
	 * e820__range_remove doesn't ask for the table
	 */
	removed_size = __e820__handle_range_update(&test_table,
						   0, entry_size * 2,
						   &updater, &data);
	/* The first two regions were removed */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, removed_size, entry_size * 2);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], 0, 0, 0, 0);

	removed_size = __e820__handle_range_update(&test_table,
						   0, entry_size * 3,
						   &updater, &data);
	/* Nothing was removed */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, removed_size, 0);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, 0, 0, 0);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], 0, 0, 0, 0);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[2], entry_size * 2,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_ACPI,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
}

static void __init test_e820_range_crypto_update(struct kunit *test)
{
	u64 entry_size = 15;
	u64 updated_size = 0;
	/* Initialize table */
	test_table.nr_entries = 0;
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, entry_size * 2, entry_size,
			  E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	updated_size = __e820__range_update_crypto(&test_table, 0, entry_size * 3,
						   E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	/* Only the region in the middle was updated */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, updated_size, entry_size);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, entry_size,
				   E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], entry_size,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
				   E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[2], entry_size * 2,
				   entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
				   E820_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
}

static void __init test_e820_handle_range_update_intersection(struct
kunit *test)
{
	struct e820_entry_updater updater = {
		.should_update = type_updater__should_update,
		.update = type_updater__update,
		.new = type_updater__new
	};

	struct e820_type_updater_data data = {
		.old_type = E820_TYPE_RAM,
		.new_type = E820_TYPE_RESERVED
	};

	u64 entry_size = 15;
	u64 updated_size = 0;
	/* Initialize table */
	test_table.nr_entries = 0;
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	updated_size = __e820__handle_range_update(&test_table,
						   0, entry_size - 2,
						   &updater, &data);

	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, updated_size, entry_size - 2);

	/* There is a new entry */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_table.nr_entries, 2);

	/* The original entry now is moved */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], entry_size - 2,
				   2, E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	/* The new entry has the correct values */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], 0, 13,
				   E820_TYPE_RESERVED, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
}

static void __init test_e820_handle_range_update_inside(struct kunit *test)
{
	struct e820_entry_updater updater = {
		.should_update = type_updater__should_update,
		.update = type_updater__update,
		.new = type_updater__new
	};

	struct e820_type_updater_data data = {
		.old_type = E820_TYPE_RAM,
		.new_type = E820_TYPE_RESERVED
	};

	u64 entry_size = 15;
	u64 updated_size = 0;
	/* Initialize table */
	test_table.nr_entries = 0;
	__e820__range_add(&test_table, 0, entry_size, E820_TYPE_RAM,
			  E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	updated_size = __e820__handle_range_update(&test_table,
						   5, entry_size - 10,
						   &updater, &data);

	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, updated_size, entry_size - 10);

	/* There are two new entrie */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_table.nr_entries, 3);

	/* The original entry now shrinked */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[0], 0, 5,
				   E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);

	/* The new entries have the correct values */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[1], 5,
				   entry_size - 10, E820_TYPE_RESERVED,
				   E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
	/* Left over of the original region */
	KUNIT_EXPECT_E820_ENTRY_EQ(test, test_table.entries[2], entry_size - 5,
				   5, E820_TYPE_RAM, E820_NOT_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
}

static struct kunit_case e820_test_cases[] __initdata = {
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_range_add),
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_range_update),
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_range_remove),
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_range_crypto_update),
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_handle_range_update_intersection),
        KUNIT_CASE(test_e820_handle_range_update_inside),
        {}
};

static struct kunit_suite e820_test_suite __initdata = {
        .name = "e820",
        .test_cases = e820_test_cases,
};

kunit_test_suite(e820_test_suite);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux