On 04.03.22 19:30, Yang Shi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:06 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This probably bounces on the list due to html junk from the gmail app. >> >> What happened to >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220131162940.210846-10-david@xxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> Included in the very series mentioned below? >> >> Was this silently dropped due to folio conversion collisions? :/ > > I really didn't notice you already proposed this. Maybe folio > conversion, maybe mlock cleanup, I can't tell. But anyway this patch > needs to get rebased. I will submit v2 to solve the comment, will add > your signed-off-by. > Why a rebase? The folio change comes via another tree (unfortunately not Andrews tree, I wish we would have a single MM tree for MM patches). @Andrew, the last mail I received was + mm-huge_memory-remove-stale-locking-logic-from-__split_huge_pmd.patch added to -mm tree The patch shows up in mmotm as #[merged]mm-huge_memory-remove-stale-locking-logic-from-__split_huge_pmd.patch ... which shouldn't be true. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
