On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Using msleep() seems pretty pointless so I plan to go ahead with patch > as-is, with a cc:stable. None of it is pretty, but it's better than > what we have now, yes? Yes, I've no objection to that. Hugh
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Using msleep() seems pretty pointless so I plan to go ahead with patch > as-is, with a cc:stable. None of it is pretty, but it's better than > what we have now, yes? Yes, I've no objection to that. Hugh
|