Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:

> The problem is that then there will be nothing left that actually
> tests interleaving. The numactl has caught kernel regressions in the past.

How about adding a CONFIG_NUMA_DEBUG option and have it only available
then? I think there is no general use case.

> I don't think disabling useful regression tests is a good idea.
> In contrary the kernel needs far more of them, not less.

True. Some more debugging code for the NUMA features would be appreciated
but that does not need to be enabled by default. Lately I have become a
bit concerned about the number of statistics we are adding. The
per_cpu_pageset structure should not get too large.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]