On 2/27/22 00:45, Yixuan Cao wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam, > > The sentence > "but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving" > should be rephrased with > "but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving" > where "mempolicy" is a struct name. > > Thanks and best regards, > Yixuan Cao > > Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index b454cf1a261f..89d48d8eb20c 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, > /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't > * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE, > * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node, > - * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving. > + * but mempolicy want to alloc memory by interleaving. s/want/wants/ as in your commentary above. > */ > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) > nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp, thanks. -- ~Randy
