On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:01:37PM +0100, andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Print virtual mapping range and its creator in reports affecting virtual
> mappings.
>
> Also get physical page pointer for such mappings, so page information
> gets printed as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Note: no need to merge this patch into any of the KASAN vmalloc patches
> that are already in mm, better to keep it separate.
> ---
> mm/kasan/report.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> index 137c2c0b09db..8002fb3c417d 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> @@ -260,8 +260,18 @@ static void print_address_description(void *addr, u8 tag)
> pr_err(" %pS\n", addr);
> }
>
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) {
> + struct vm_struct *va = find_vm_area(addr);
> +
> + pr_err("The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at\n"
> + " [%px, %px) created by:\n"
> + " %pS\n", va->addr, va->addr + va->size, va->caller);
The return value of find_vm_area() needs a NULL check here;
is_vmalloc_addr(addr) just checks that `addr` is within the vmalloc VA
range, and doesn't guarantee that there is a vmap_area associated with
that `addr`.
Without the NULL-check, we'll blow up on the `va->addr` dereference and
will fail to make the report, which would be unfortunate.
Thanks,
Mark.
> +
> + page = vmalloc_to_page(page);
> + }
> +
> if (page) {
> - pr_err("The buggy address belongs to the page:\n");
> + pr_err("The buggy address belongs to the physical page:\n");
> dump_page(page, "kasan: bad access detected");
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
