On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:40 AM 'Michal Hocko' via kernel-team <kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed 09-02-22 20:32:15, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > When adjacent vmas are being merged it can result in the vma that was > > originally passed to madvise_update_vma being destroyed. In the current > > implementation, the name parameter passed to madvise_update_vma points > > directly to vma->anon_name->name and it is used after the call to > > vma_merge. In the cases when vma_merge merges the original vma and > > destroys it, this will result in use-after-free bug as shown below: > > > > madvise_vma_behavior << passes vma->anon_name->name as name param > > madvise_update_vma(name) > > vma_merge > > __vma_adjust > > vm_area_free <-- frees the vma > > replace_vma_anon_name(name) <-- UAF > > > > Fix this by raising the name refcount and stabilizing it. Introduce > > vma_anon_name_{get/put} API for this purpose. > > What is the reason that madvise_update_vma uses the naked name rather > than the encapsulated anon_vma_name? This really just begs for problems. The reason for that is the second place it's being used from the prctl syscall: prctl_set_vma madvise_set_anon_name madvise_vma_anon_name madvise_update_vma In that case the name parameter is not part of any anon_vma_name struct and therefore is stable. I can add a comment to madvise_update_vma indicating that the name parameter has to be stable if that helps. > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs > > -- > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx. >