On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 19:37, <andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> With HW_TAGS KASAN and kasan.stacktrace=off, the cache created in the
> kmem_cache_double_destroy() test might get merged with an existing one.
> Thus, the first kmem_cache_destroy() call won't actually destroy it
> but will only descrease the refcount. This causes the test to fail.
s/descrease/decrease/
> Provide an empty contructor for the created cache to prevent the cache
s/contructor/constructor/
> from getting merged.
>
> Fixes: f98f966cd750 ("kasan: test: add test case for double-kmem_cache_destroy()")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/test_kasan.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> index 26a5c9007653..3b413f8c8a71 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> @@ -869,11 +869,14 @@ static void kmem_cache_invalid_free(struct kunit *test)
> kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> }
>
> +static void empty_cache_ctor(void *object) { }
> +
> static void kmem_cache_double_destroy(struct kunit *test)
> {
> struct kmem_cache *cache;
>
> - cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", 200, 0, 0, NULL);
> + /* Provide a constructor to prevent cache merging. */
> + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", 200, 0, 0, empty_cache_ctor);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_destroy(cache));
> --
> 2.25.1
>
