On 2022-02-03 17:01:41 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > Let me know if a revert is preferred or you want to keep that so that I > > I see that's discussed in the subthread with Michal Hocko, so I would be > also leaning towards revert unless convincing numbers are provided. > > > can prepare the patches accordingly before posting. > > An acceptable form of this would have to basically replace the bool > stock_lock_acquried with two variants of the code paths that rely on it, > feel free to read though the previous occurence :) > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiJLqL2cUhJbvpyPQpkbVOu1rVSzgO2=S2jC55hneLtfQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I did that locally already. I was referring to the revert. So repost with bool fixed and the revert will be discussed later or include the revert at the begin of the series and then rebase these patches on top of it? I probably don't get to it before FRI so I don't try to rush anyone here ;) Sebastian
