On Tue 08-02-22 13:13:15, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 07-02-22 19:05:31, Waiman Long wrote: [...] > > + ret += scnprintf(kbuf + ret, count - ret, "\n"); > > I do not see any overflow prevention here. I believe you really need to > check ret >= count after each scnprintf/cgroup_name. OK, I have only now realized that scnprintf would return size - 1 on overflow so explicitly checking for the overlow shouldn't be reallu necessary. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
