On 2/4/22, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:43:28PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote: >> +Description: >> + This value is 1 if all system memory in this node is >> + marked with EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO, indicating that the > > It didn't jump at me at previous postings, but other architectures won't > necessary have EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO marking crypto-capable memory. > > How about > > This value is 1 if all system memory in this node is capable of being > protected with the CPU's memory cryptographic capabilities. It is 0 > otherwise. > On EFI architectures with value corresponds to EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO. > > Yes, sounds good to me. Is there other architecture with something similar to this? Or are you thinking on the possibility of such architecture?
