Re: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> And even if people want to support multiple ABIs and fight it out to
> see which one wins, we should factor out the generic parts and put
> them under mm/*.c and not hide them in random modules.
> 

Agreed.  This came up recently when another lowmem killer was proposed and 
the suggestion was to enable the memory controller to be able to have the 
memory threshold notifications with eventfd(2) and cgroup.event_control.  
It would be very nice to have a generic lowmem notifier (like 
/dev/mem_notify that has been reworked several times in the past) rather 
than tying it to a particular cgroup, especially when that cgroup incurs a 
substantial overhead for embedded users.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]