On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:10:04AM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > Attempt speculative mm fault handling first, and fall back to the > existing (non-speculative) code if that fails. > > This follows the lines of the x86 speculative fault handling code, > but with some minor arch differences such as the way that the > VM_FAULT_BADACCESS case is handled. > > Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > index 77341b160aca..2598795f4e70 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #include <linux/perf_event.h> > #include <linux/preempt.h> > #include <linux/hugetlb.h> > +#include <linux/vm_event_item.h> > > #include <asm/acpi.h> > #include <asm/bug.h> > @@ -524,6 +525,11 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned int esr, > unsigned long vm_flags; > unsigned int mm_flags = FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT; > unsigned long addr = untagged_addr(far); > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT > + struct vm_area_struct *vma; > + struct vm_area_struct pvma; > + unsigned long seq; > +#endif > > if (kprobe_page_fault(regs, esr)) > return 0; > @@ -574,6 +580,59 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned int esr, > > perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, addr); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT > + /* > + * No need to try speculative faults for kernel or > + * single threaded user space. > + */ > + if (!(mm_flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER) || atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1) > + goto no_spf; > + > + count_vm_event(SPF_ATTEMPT); > + seq = mmap_seq_read_start(mm); > + if (seq & 1) { > + count_vm_spf_event(SPF_ABORT_ODD); > + goto spf_abort; > + } > + rcu_read_lock(); > + vma = __find_vma(mm, addr); > + if (!vma || vma->vm_start > addr) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + count_vm_spf_event(SPF_ABORT_UNMAPPED); > + goto spf_abort; > + } > + if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma)) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + count_vm_spf_event(SPF_ABORT_NO_SPECULATE); > + goto spf_abort; > + } > + pvma = *vma; > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + if (!mmap_seq_read_check(mm, seq, SPF_ABORT_VMA_COPY)) > + goto spf_abort; > + vma = &pvma; > + if (!(vma->vm_flags & vm_flags)) { > + count_vm_spf_event(SPF_ABORT_ACCESS_ERROR); > + goto spf_abort; > + } > + fault = do_handle_mm_fault(vma, addr & PAGE_MASK, > + mm_flags | FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE, seq, regs); > + > + /* Quick path to respond to signals */ > + if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs)) { > + if (!user_mode(regs)) > + goto no_context; > + return 0; > + } > + if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) > + goto done; > + > +spf_abort: > + count_vm_event(SPF_ABORT); > +no_spf: > + > +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */ The speculative page fault implementation here (and for PowerPC as well) looks very similar to x86. Can we factor it our rather than copy 3 (or more) times? > + > /* > * As per x86, we may deadlock here. However, since the kernel only > * validly references user space from well defined areas of the code, > @@ -612,6 +671,9 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned int esr, > goto retry; > } > mmap_read_unlock(mm); > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT > +done: > +#endif > > /* > * Handle the "normal" (no error) case first. > -- > 2.20.1 > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.