[PATCH] memcg: replace in_interrupt() with !in_task()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Replace the deprecated in_interrupt() with !in_task() because
in_interrupt() returns true for BH disabled even if the call happens in
the task context. in_task() is the right interface to differentiate
task context from NMI, hard IRQ and softirq contexts.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d067366002e6..215dfe325e9d 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2688,7 +2688,7 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			READ_ONCE(memcg->swap.high);
 
 		/* Don't bother a random interrupted task */
-		if (in_interrupt()) {
+		if (!in_task()) {
 			if (mem_high) {
 				schedule_work(&memcg->high_work);
 				break;
@@ -6968,7 +6968,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk)
 		return;
 
 	/* Do not associate the sock with unrelated interrupted task's memcg. */
-	if (in_interrupt())
+	if (!in_task())
 		return;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-- 
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux