On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:24:12 +0100, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ static inline void call_function_init(void) { }
int on_each_cpu(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, int wait);
/*
+ * Call a function on processors specified by mask, which might include
+ * the local one.
+ */
+void on_each_cpu_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, void (*func)(void *),
+ void *info, bool wait);
+
on_each_cpu() returns an int. For consistency reasons, would it make sense to
make on_each_cpu_maks() to return and int? I know that the difference is that
smp_call_function() returns and int and smp_call_function_many() returns void,
but to me it actually seems strange and either I'm missing something important
(which is likely) or this needs to get cleaned up at one point as well.
+/*
* Mark the boot cpu "online" so that it can call console drivers in
* printk() and can access its per-cpu storage.
*/
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href