Re: [PATCH v4 50/66] mm/gup: Use maple tree navigation instead of linked list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> [220119 12:39]:
> On 12/1/21 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Empty message.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/gup.c | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index 2c51e9748a6a..60892e5df6a2 100644
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -1570,7 +1570,6 @@ int __mm_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, int ignore_errors)
> >  	long ret = 0;
> >  
> >  	end = start + len;
> > -
> >  	for (nstart = start; nstart < end; nstart = nend) {
> >  		/*
> >  		 * We want to fault in pages for [nstart; end) address range.
> > @@ -1579,10 +1578,10 @@ int __mm_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, int ignore_errors)
> >  		if (!locked) {
> >  			locked = 1;
> >  			mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > -			vma = find_vma(mm, nstart);
> > +			vma = find_vma_intersection(mm, start, end);
> 
> Is it ok to use start instead of nstart? At least theoretically,
> populate_vma_page_range() called later can reset locked to 0, so !locked
> doesn't guarantee we are in the first iteration?

It is not okay to use start instead of nstart, I will fix this patch.

> 
> >  		} else if (nstart >= vma->vm_end)
> > -			vma = vma->vm_next;
> > -		if (!vma || vma->vm_start >= end)
> > +			vma = find_vma(mm, vma->vm_end);
> > +		if (!vma)
> >  			break;
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Set [nstart; nend) to intersection of desired address
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux