Re: [PATCH 3/5] memcg: lru_size instead of MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(1/1/12 2:30 AM), Hugh Dickins wrote:
I never understood why we need a MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) macro
to obscure the LRU counts.  For easier searching?  So call it
lru_size rather than bare count (lru_length sounds better, but
would be wrong, since each huge page raises lru_size hugely).

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins<hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>

I don't dislike both before and after. so, I'm keeping neutral. :-)


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]