I have only noticed your email now after replying to v3 so our emails
have crossed.
On Fri 14-01-22 09:39:55, Joel Savitz wrote:
> > What has happened to the oom victim and why it has never exited?
>
> What appears to happen is that the oom victim is sent SIGKILL by the
> process that triggers the oom while also being marked as an oom
> victim.
>
> As you mention in your patchset introducing the oom reaper in commit
> aac4536355496 ("mm, oom: introduce oom reaper"), the purpose the the
> oom reaper is to try and free more memory more quickly than it
> otherwise would have been by assuming anonymous or swapped out pages
> won't be needed in the exit path as the owner is already dying.
> However, this assumption is violated by the futex_cleanup() path,
> which needs access to userspace in fetch_robust_entry() when it is
> called in exit_robust_list(). Trace_printk()s in this failure path
> reveal an apparent race between the oom reaper thread reaping the
> victim's mm and the futex_cleanup() path. There may be other ways that
> this race manifests but we have been most consistently able to trace
> that one.
Please let's continue the discussion in the v3 email thread:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220114180135.83308-1-npache@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
