Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:23:57 +0800
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yang Shi <shy828301@xxxxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cgroups <cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220111010302.8864-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
References: <20220111010302.8864-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:03 AM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Instead of use "-1", let's use NUMA_NO_NODE for consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

References:
- [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node
  - From: Wei Yang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/migration: Add trace events for THP migrations
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_per_node is already set to 0 on allocation
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/memcg: refine mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold calculation
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux