On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:46 PM Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So unless we want to eschew big mm changes entirely (we shouldn't!
> look at net or scheduling for how important big rewrites are to
> progress), I think we should be open to experimenting with new stuff.
So I personally think this is worth going with, partly simply due to
the reported improvements that have been measured.
But also to a large extent because the whole notion of doing
multi-generational LRU isn't exactly some wackadoodle crazy thing. We
already do active vs inactive, the whole multi-generational thing just
doesn't seem to be so "far out".
But yes, numbers talk, and I get the feeling that we just need to try
it. Maybe not 5.17, but..
Linus
