This macro doesn't simplify the users; it's easier to just call
compound_range_next() inside the loop.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/gup.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 2c51e9748a6a..7a07e0c00bf5 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -236,9 +236,6 @@ static inline void compound_range_next(unsigned long i, unsigned long npages,
struct page *next, *page;
unsigned int nr = 1;
- if (i >= npages)
- return;
-
next = *list + i;
page = compound_head(next);
if (PageCompound(page) && compound_order(page) >= 1)
@@ -249,12 +246,6 @@ static inline void compound_range_next(unsigned long i, unsigned long npages,
*ntails = nr;
}
-#define for_each_compound_range(__i, __list, __npages, __head, __ntails) \
- for (__i = 0, \
- compound_range_next(__i, __npages, __list, &(__head), &(__ntails)); \
- __i < __npages; __i += __ntails, \
- compound_range_next(__i, __npages, __list, &(__head), &(__ntails)))
-
static inline void compound_next(unsigned long i, unsigned long npages,
struct page **list, struct page **head,
unsigned int *ntails)
@@ -371,7 +362,8 @@ void unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock(struct page *page, unsigned long npages,
struct page *head;
unsigned int ntails;
- for_each_compound_range(index, &page, npages, head, ntails) {
+ for (index = 0; index < npages; index += ntails) {
+ compound_range_next(index, npages, &page, &head, &ntails);
if (make_dirty && !PageDirty(head))
set_page_dirty_lock(head);
put_compound_head(head, ntails, FOLL_PIN);
--
2.33.0
