Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it.
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:59:56 +0100
Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20211222114111.2206248-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
References: <20211222114111.2206248-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:41:08PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - lockdep complains were triggered by test_core and test_freezer (both
>   had to run):

This doesn't happen on the patched kernel, correct?

Thanks,
Michal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it.
  - From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it.
  - From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Prev by Date: [linux-next:master 5594/9257] drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c:1177 vmw_translate_mob_ptr() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'
Next by Date: [PATCH v3] mm: shmem: implement POSIX_FADV_[WILL|DONT]NEED for shmem
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object.
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]