Re: [PATCH] mm/util.c: Make kvfree() safe for calling while holding spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Vasily,

On 12/23/21 08:21, Vasily Averin wrote:

I would prefer to release memory ASAP if it's possible.
What do you think about this change?
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -614,9 +614,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmalloc_node);
   */
  void kvfree(const void *addr)
  {
-       if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
-               vfree(addr);
-       else
+       if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr)) {
+               if (in_atomic())
+                       vfree_atomic();
+               else
+                       vfree(addr);
+       } else
                 kfree(addr);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvfree);

Unfortunately this cannot work:

/*
* Are we running in atomic context?  WARNING: this macro cannot
* always detect atomic context; in particular, it cannot know about
* held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels.  Thus it should not be
* used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
* Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
*/
#define in_atomic()     (preempt_count() != 0)


--

    Manfred






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux