Re: Question about missing "cld" in x86 string assembly code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2011年12月18日 01:08, Brian Gerst wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Nai Xia<nai.xia@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Hi Andi,

Seems I used a stale email address of you from a related git commit log,
so this is a resend, sorry.

=======
Hi,

I notice that all x86 assembly code for string operations containing
"scasb, lodsb", etc does not have "cld" at the beginning.
Is this 100% safe?
Or in other words, how could we be sure that
there is no "std" generated by compiler somewhere just before
the string operations?


Thanks,

Nai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

The i386 ELF ABI states "The direction flag must be set to the
‘‘forward’’ (that is, zero) direction before entry and upon exit from
a function."  Therefore it can be assumed to be clear, unless
explicitly set.

Hmm, I get those lines now. Thanks for reply.
Seems gcc started to strictly conform to this ABI since 4.3 . But glibc
seems still have some leading "cld" string code, maybe just prepared for
non-conforming kernels other than Linux.


--
Brian Gerst

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]