Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年12月14日周二 13:49写道： > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:56:08PM +0800, yong w wrote: > > Hello, is this patch OK? > > > > Thanks. > > > > yong w <yongw.pur@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年12月8日周三 00:50写道： > > > > > > Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年12月7日周二 13:16写道： > > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:08:02PM +0800, yong w wrote: > > > > > Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> 于2021年12月5日周日 16:17写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 04:09:55AM -0800, yongw.pur@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > From: wangyong <wang.yong12@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Delay accounting does not track the delay of memory compact. > > > > > > > When there is not enough free memory, tasks can spend > > > > > > > a amount of their time waiting for compact. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To get the impact of tasks in direct memory compact, measure > > > > > > > the delay when allocating memory through memory compact. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we call this DIRECT_COMPACT and through documentation > > > > > > or name change imply that this won't work for kcompactd the > > > > > > kernel thread - based on my reading of the patches. > > > > > > > > > > > Using DIRECT_COMPACT is a little redundant，because the > > > > > delayacct stats of delay accounting is specific to tasks, it has > > > > > nothing to do with kcompactd, which is similar to the RECLAIM field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > What would we expect when we call delayacct -p <pidof kcompactd> > > > > to be output? > > > If the slow path of memory allocation is invoked in the kcompacd process, > > > there may be delays being recorded. > > > > > > > Don't feel to strongly, but it can be confusing that kcompactd > > > > has spent no time in compact'ing? Not that delayacct is used for > > > > kernel threads, but I am not sure if that use case exists today. > > > Yes, delayacct does not restrict the process of obtaining information， > > > but kcompactd is used for compaction, the compact delay of > > > kcompatd is not actually a delay.Maybe it can be added to the > > > document later to make it clearer. > > > > > > Thanks for your reply! > > Please avoid top posting, when you say added later, I presume more > patches for documentation are coming. I am OK with the patch in that > case. > > Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> > > Balbir Singh OK，Thank you!
