[PATCH 04/48] mm/writeback: Improve __folio_mark_dirty() comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add some notes about how this function needs to be called.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index a613f8ef6a02..91d163f8d36b 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2496,7 +2496,11 @@ void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
  * If warn is true, then emit a warning if the folio is not uptodate and has
  * not been truncated.
  *
- * The caller must hold lock_page_memcg().
+ * The caller must hold lock_page_memcg().  Most callers have the folio
+ * locked.  A few have the folio blocked from truncation through other
+ * means (eg zap_page_range() has it mapped and is holding the page table
+ * lock).  This can also be called from mark_buffer_dirty(), which I
+ * cannot prove is always protected against truncate.
  */
 void __folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
 			     int warn)
-- 
2.33.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux