On Sun 05-12-21 22:33:37, Nico Pache wrote:
> We shouldn't allocate pages on a unavailable node. Add a check for this
> in __alloc_pages_node and return NULL to avoid issues further down the
> callchain.
>
> Also update the VM_WARN_ON in __alloc_pages_node which could skip this
> warn if the gfp_mask is not GFP_THISNODE.
Page allocator trusts callers to know they are doing a right thing so
that no unnecessary branches have to be implemented and the fast path is
really optimized for performance. Allocating from an !node_online node
is a bug in the caller. One that is not really that hard to make
unfortunatelly but also one that is is not that common.
That being said I am not really sure we want to introduce this check.
> Co-developed-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/gfp.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
> index b976c4177299..e7e18f6d0d9d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gfp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
> @@ -565,7 +565,10 @@ static inline struct page *
> __alloc_pages_node(int nid, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> {
> VM_BUG_ON(nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
> - VM_WARN_ON((gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE) && !node_online(nid));
> + VM_WARN_ON(!node_online(nid));
> +
> + if (!node_online(nid))
> + return NULL;
>
> return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order, nid, NULL);
> }
> --
> 2.33.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
