> The main downside of this approach is that mem_cg needs 20 bytes per > page (on a 32 bit machine). So on a 32 bit machine with 4K pages > that's approx. 0.5% of RAM, or, in other words, 5MB on a 1GB machine. The obvious question would be why? Would fixing memcg make more sense ? The only problem I see with having a user space manager is that manager probably has to be mlock to avoid awkward fail cases and that may in fact make it smaller kernel side. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>