On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:13:24PM -0800, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> + if (abs_timeout) {
> + hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack(&timeout, CLOCK_REALTIME,
> + HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
Using CLOCK_REALTIME timers while the rest of the thing runs off of
CLOCK_MONOTONIC doesn't seem to make sense to me. Why would you want to
have timeouts subject to DST shifts and crap like that?
