On 11/22/21 11:36, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> But it seems there's no reason we couldn't do better? I.e. use the value of >> SLOB_HDR_SIZE only to align the beginning of actual object (and name the >> define different than SLOB_HDR_SIZE). But the size of the header, where we >> store the object lenght could be just a native word - 4 bytes on 32bit, 8 on >> 64bit. The address of the header shouldn't have a reason to be also aligned >> to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN / ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN as only SLOB itself processes >> it and not the slab consumers which rely on those alignments? > > Well the best way would be to put it at the end of the object in order to > avoid the alignment problem. This is a particular issue with SLOB because > it allows multiple types of objects in a single page frame. > > If only one type of object would be allowed then the object size etc can > be stored in the page struct. > > So I guess placement at the beginning cannot be avoided. That in turn runs > into trouble with the DMA requirements on some platforms where the > beginning of the object has to be cache line aligned. It's no problem to have the real beginning of the object aligned, and the prepended header not. The code already does that before this patch for the kmalloc power-of-two alignments, where e.g. the object can be aligned to 256 bytes, but the prepended header to a smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN / ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN. > I dont know but it seems that making slob that sophisticated is counter > productive. Remove SLOB? I wouldn't mind, but somebody might :)
