On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:17, Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 5:04 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 10:00, Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 4:52 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 06:29, Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Kernel linear mapping will be split to the smallest granularity when > > > > > RODATA_FULL applied, which could lead to TLB pressure. Introduce a method > > > > > to apply PTE_CONT on pte. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > How would this lead to TLB pressure, and how does the use of > > > > contiguous mappings mitigate that? The linear mapping of the kernel is > > > > rarely used, as all normal accesses to it go via the vmalloc region, > > > > so in which case would TLB entries be allocated for this region in a > > > > way that could cause a measurable performance impact? > > > In fact, the patch is about to use PTE_CONT *OUT OF* the range of > > > kernel text. > > > > OK, I had missed that, apologies. > > > > > Would you please have a look at the code. It apply > > > PTE_CONT during map_mem and then clear it when load_module change the > > > corresponding linear mapping to the area it use in vmalloc area. > > > > You cannot change the PTE_CONT attribute on live mappings. > Is it an inner constraint from ASIC perspective? PTE_CONT is different > to other attributes? The PTE_CONT attributes on live translation entries must always be in sync in all entries covering the same contiguous group, or you might cause TLB conflict aborts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > > > > > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > > > > arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > > > index fee914c..3f8fbf0 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > > > @@ -1198,6 +1198,15 @@ config RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED > > > > > This requires the linear region to be mapped down to pages, > > > > > which may adversely affect performance in some cases. > > > > > > > > > > +config RODATA_FULL_USE_PTE_CONT > > > > > + bool "Apply PTE_CONT when RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED enabled" > > > > > + depends on RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED > > > > > + default y > > > > > + help > > > > > + Apply PTE_CONT on linear mapping as much as we can when > > > > > + RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED enabled which could decrease the > > > > > + impaction on performance by small pte granularity. > > > > > + > > > > > config ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN > > > > > bool "Emulate Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching" > > > > > help > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > > > index cfd9deb..8017b17 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > > > > > @@ -124,15 +124,21 @@ static bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new) > > > > > * The following mapping attributes may be updated in live > > > > > * kernel mappings without the need for break-before-make. > > > > > */ > > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_USE_PTE_CONT > > > > > pteval_t mask = PTE_PXN | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_NG; > > > > > +#else > > > > > + pteval_t mask = PTE_PXN | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_NG | PTE_CONT; > > > > > +#endif > > > > What justifies this change? Why is it ok in certain cases to update > > the PTE_CONT attribute without BBM? > BBM? > I am not sure if it is ok here, but I just find nobody else change > PTE_CONT so far other than this commit. No it is not ok. BBM == break before make, which means you need to install invalid entries for the entire contiguous group before you can change the PTE_CONT attributes. As other CPUs may be accessing the same region, there is no safe way to do this, which is why we don't permit PTE_CONT to be changed at all. > > > > > > > > > > > > /* creating or taking down mappings is always safe */ > > > > > if (old == 0 || new == 0) > > > > > return true; > > > > > > > > > > /* live contiguous mappings may not be manipulated at all */ > > > > > - if ((old | new) & PTE_CONT) > > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_USE_PTE_CONT > > > > > + if ((old | new) & PTE_CONT) > > > > > return false; > > > > > +#endif > > > > > > > > > > /* Transitioning from Non-Global to Global is unsafe */ > > > > > if (old & ~new & PTE_NG) > > > > > @@ -206,7 +212,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > > > > > > > > > > /* use a contiguous mapping if the range is suitably aligned */ > > > > > if ((((addr | next | phys) & ~CONT_PTE_MASK) == 0) && > > > > > - (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) > > > > > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_USE_PTE_CONT) || (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0)) > > > > > __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); > > > > > > > > > > init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot); > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c > > > > > index a3bacd7..88a87eb 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c > > > > > @@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages, > > > > > if (rodata_full && (pgprot_val(set_mask) == PTE_RDONLY || > > > > > pgprot_val(clear_mask) == PTE_RDONLY)) { > > > > > for (i = 0; i < area->nr_pages; i++) { > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_USE_PTE_CONT > > > > > + unsigned long cont_pte_low_bound; > > > > > + unsigned long addr; > > > > > + > > > > > + addr = (u64)page_address(area->pages[i]); > > > > > + cont_pte_low_bound = addr & CONT_PTE_MASK; > > > > > + __change_memory_common(cont_pte_low_bound, > > > > > + (~CONT_PTE_MASK + 1), __pgprot(0) , __pgprot(PTE_CONT)); > > > > > +#endif > > > > > __change_memory_common((u64)page_address(area->pages[i]), > > > > > PAGE_SIZE, set_mask, clear_mask); > > > > > } > > > > > -- > > > > > 1.9.1 > > > > >