Hi Xin, Thank you for this patch. >From next time, please send patches for DAMON to sj@xxxxxxxxxx instead of sjpark@xxxxxxxxx. On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:16:02 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In dbgfs "schemes" interface, i do some test like this: > # cd /sys/kernel/debug/damon > # echo "2 1 2 1 10 1 3 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3" > schemes > # cat schemes > # 2 1 2 1 10 1 3 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 0 > > There have some unreasonable places, i set the valules of these variables > "<min_sz, max_sz> <min_nr_a, max_nr_a>, <min_age, max_age>, <wmarks.high, > wmarks.mid, wmarks.low>" as "<2, 1>, <2, 1>, <10, 1>, <1, 2, 3>. > > So there add a validity judgment for these threshold values. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c > index befb27a29aab..a4c94d563d3d 100644 > --- a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c > +++ b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c > @@ -215,6 +215,17 @@ static struct damos **str_to_schemes(const char *str, ssize_t len, > goto fail; > } > > + if (min_sz > max_sz || min_nr_a > max_nr_a || min_age > max_age) { > + pr_err("mininum > maxinum\n"); I think this error message is not really needed. > + goto fail; > + } > + > + if (wmarks.high < wmarks.mid || wmarks.high < wmarks.low || > + wmarks.mid < wmarks.low) { > + pr_err("wrong wmarks\n"); Ditto. Thanks, SJ > + goto fail; > + } > + > pos += parsed; > scheme = damon_new_scheme(min_sz, max_sz, min_nr_a, max_nr_a, > min_age, max_age, action, "a, &wmarks); > -- > 2.31.0