Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] mm: Rework swap handling of zap_pte_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/15/21 05:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:49:51PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
Clean the code up by merging the device private/exclusive swap entry handling
with the rest, then we merge the pte clear operation too.

struct* page is defined in multiple places in the function, move it upward.

Is that actually a good thing?  There was a time when declaring

Yes. It is a very good thing. Having multiple cases of shadowed variables
(in this case I'm using programming language terminology, or what I
remember it as, anyway) provides lots of opportunities to create
hard-to-spot bugs.

variables more locally helped compilers with liveness analysis and
register allocation.  Compilers are probably smarter now.


...as long as the above checks out, and I see from Peter's response that
we're OK.


thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux