Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm: Rework swap handling of zap_pte_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:21:18PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> Hi Peter,

Hi, Alistair,

> 
> I was having trouble applying this cleanly to any of my local trees so was
> wondering which sha1 should I be applying this on top of? Thanks.

Thanks for considering trying it out.  I thought it was easy to apply onto any
of the recent branches as long as with -mm's rc1 applied, and I just did it to
Linus's 5.16-rc1 in my uffd-wp rebase:

https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/commits/uffd-wp-shmem-hugetlbfs

This commit is here:

https://github.com/xzpeter/linux/commit/c32043436282bb352e6fe10eb5fa693340fe5281

It could be that "git rebase" is normally smarter so I didn't notice it's not
applicable directly.

I'll repost a new version soon, please also consider to fetch directly from the
git tree too before I do so.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux