Thank you for this patch, Alex! On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 19:47:21 +0800 alexs@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Variable nr_running_ctxs guards by damon_lock, but a lock for a int > variable seems a bit heavy, a atomic_t is enough. The lock is not only for protecting nr_running_ctxs, but also for avoiding different users concurrently executing damon_start(), because that could allow the users interfering others. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > include/linux/damon.h | 1 - > mm/damon/core.c | 31 +++++-------------------------- > mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 8 +++++--- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h > index b4d4be3cc987..e5dcc6336ef2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/damon.h > +++ b/include/linux/damon.h > @@ -453,7 +453,6 @@ int damon_set_attrs(struct damon_ctx *ctx, unsigned long sample_int, > unsigned long min_nr_reg, unsigned long max_nr_reg); > int damon_set_schemes(struct damon_ctx *ctx, > struct damos **schemes, ssize_t nr_schemes); > -int damon_nr_running_ctxs(void); > > int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs); > int damon_stop(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs); > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c > index c381b3c525d0..e821e36d5c10 100644 > --- a/mm/damon/core.c > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c [...] > @@ -437,19 +422,15 @@ int damon_start(struct damon_ctx **ctxs, int nr_ctxs) > int i; > int err = 0; > > - mutex_lock(&damon_lock); > - if (nr_running_ctxs) { > - mutex_unlock(&damon_lock); > + if (atomic_read(&nr_running_ctxs)) > return -EBUSY; > - } > > for (i = 0; i < nr_ctxs; i++) { > err = __damon_start(ctxs[i]); > if (err) > break; > - nr_running_ctxs++; > + atomic_inc(&nr_running_ctxs); > } > - mutex_unlock(&damon_lock); > > return err; > } This would let multiple concurrent threads seeing nr_running_ctxs of zero and therefore proceed together. Thanks, SJ