在 2021/11/1 16:24, Michal Hocko 写道:
Hi,
On Mon 01-11-21 16:05:50, Yongqiang Liu wrote:
[...]
And we found that when the oom_reaper is done but the memory is still high:
[ 45.115685] Out of memory: Killed process 2553 (oom) total-vm:953404kB,
anon-rss:947748kB, file-rss:388kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:0 pgtables:1896kB
oom_score_adj:1000
[ 45.115739] oom_reaper: reaped process 2553 (oom), now anon-rss:947708kB,
file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB
This is because the bad proccess which recieved SIGKILL is unlocking the mem
to exit which needs more time. And the next oom is triggered to kill the
other system process.
Yes, this is a known limitation of the oom_reaper based OOM killing.
__oom_reap_task_mm has to skip over mlocked memory areas because
munlocking requires some locking (or at least that was the case when the
oom reaper was introduced) and the primary purpose of the oom_reaper is
to guarantee a forward progress.
Addressing that limitation would require the munlock operation to not
depend on any locking. I am not sure how much work that would be with
the current code. Until now this was not a high priority because
processes with a high mlock limit should be really trusted with their
memory consumption so they shouldn't be really the primary oom killer
target.
Are you seeing this problem happening with a real workload or is this
only triggered with some artificial tests? E.g. LTP oom tests are known
to trigger this situation but they do not represent any real workload.
I haven't found it in real workload yet. It's just a testcase.
--
Yongqiang Liu
