Re: XFS causing stack overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 01:00:36AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Where does the x86-64 do the interrupt stack switch?
> 
> in entry_64.S
> 
> > 
> > I know the x86 32 bit interrupt handler switches to an irq/softirq
> > context stack, but the 64 bit one doesn't appear to. Indeed,
> > arch/x86/kernel/irq_{32,64}.c are very different, and only the 32
> > bit irq handler switches to another stack to process the
> > interrupts...
> 
> x86-64 always used interrupt stacks and has used softirq stacks
> for a long time. 32bit got to it much later (the only good 
> thing left from that 4k stack "experiment")

Oh, it's hidden in the "SAVE_ARGS_IRQ" macro. 

But that happens before do_IRQ is called, so what is the do_IRQ call
chain doing on this stack given that we've already supposed to have
switched to the interrupt stack before do_IRQ is called?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]