Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu_ref: percpu_ref_tryget_live() version holding RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/21 21:10, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 09:03:18PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
+/**
+ * percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu - same as percpu_ref_tryget_live() but the
+ * caller is responsible for taking RCU.
+ *
+ * This function is safe to call as long as @ref is between init and exit.
+ */
+static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
+{
+	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	if (likely(__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))) {
+		this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
+		ret = true;
+	} else if (!(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_DEAD)) {
+		ret = atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&ref->data->count);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}

Can we please add rcu_read_lock_held() assertion? Other than that, looks
fine to me.

Will add, thanks

--
Pavel Begunkov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux