On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during > > the last iteration. > > > > I should highlight: > > 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions) > > it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it > > deserves > > 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the > > task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements. > > To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent > > pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate > > through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway) > > > > The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes. > > > > Kame, > > Does this one address your previous concerns? > Your highlight seems good. I'll look into details. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>