Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: page_alloc: skip bulk allocator for __GFP_ACCOUNT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.10.2021 18:16, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The commit 5c1f4e690eec ("mm/vmalloc: switch to bulk allocator in
> __vmalloc_area_node()") switched to bulk page allocator for order 0
> allocation backing vmalloc. However bulk page allocator does not support
> __GFP_ACCOUNT allocations and there are several users of
> kvmalloc(__GFP_ACCOUNT).
> 
> For now make __GFP_ACCOUNT allocations bypass bulk page allocator. In
> future if there is workload that can be significantly improved with the
> bulk page allocator with __GFP_ACCCOUNT support, we can revisit the
> decision.
> 
> Fixes: 5c1f4e690eec ("mm/vmalloc: switch to bulk allocator in __vmalloc_area_node()")
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reported-and-tested-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - do fallback allocation instead of failure, suggested by Michal Hocko.
> - Added memcg_kmem_enabled() check, corrected by Vasily Averin
> 
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 668edb16446a..9ca871dc8602 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5230,6 +5230,10 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
>  	if (unlikely(page_array && nr_pages - nr_populated == 0))
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/* Bulk allocator does not support memcg accounting. */
> +	if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT))
> +		goto failed;
> +
>  	/* Use the single page allocator for one page. */
>  	if (nr_pages - nr_populated == 1)
>  		goto failed;
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux