Re: [PATCH v2] md: Kill usage of page->index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree Guoqing's comments.

In Documentation/driver-api/md/md-cluster.rst, there is a pic in "1. On-disk format".
Which describes the layout of "sb+bitmap" area.

And even in non-cluster array, bitmap area more than 1 pages also needs index/offset.
After the serial patches removing page->index, md layer should create a similar
struct to manage it.

- Heming

On 10/15/21 11:01, Guoqing Jiang wrote:


On 10/14/21 10:30 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 04:58:46PM +0800,heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx  wrote:
Hello all,

The page->index takes an important role for cluster-md module.
i.e, a two-node HA env, node A bitmap may be managed in first 4K area, then
node B bitmap is in 8K area (the second page). this patch removes the index
and fix/hardcode index with value 0, which will only operate first node bitmap.

If this serial patches are important and must be merged in mainline, we should
redesign code logic for the related code.

Thanks,
Heming
Can you look at and test the updated patch below? The more I look at the md
bitmap code the more it scares me.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] md: Kill usage of page->index

As part of the struct page cleanups underway, we want to remove as much
usage of page->mapping and page->index as possible, as frequently they
are known from context - as they are here in the md bitmap code.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet<kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
  drivers/md/md-bitmap.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
index e29c6298ef..316e4cd5a7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
@@ -165,10 +165,8 @@ static int read_sb_page(struct mddev *mddev, loff_t offset,
          if (sync_page_io(rdev, target,
                   roundup(size, bdev_logical_block_size(rdev->bdev)),
-                 page, REQ_OP_READ, 0, true)) {
-            page->index = index;
+                 page, REQ_OP_READ, 0, true))
              return 0;
-        }
      }
      return -EIO;
  }
@@ -209,7 +207,8 @@ static struct md_rdev *next_active_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mdde
      return NULL;
  }
-static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
+static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page,
+             unsigned long index, int wait)
  {
      struct md_rdev *rdev;
      struct block_device *bdev;
@@ -224,7 +223,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
          bdev = (rdev->meta_bdev) ? rdev->meta_bdev : rdev->bdev;
-        if (page->index == store->file_pages-1) {
+        if (index == store->file_pages-1) {
              int last_page_size = store->bytes & (PAGE_SIZE-1);
              if (last_page_size == 0)
                  last_page_size = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -236,8 +235,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
           */
          if (mddev->external) {
              /* Bitmap could be anywhere. */
-            if (rdev->sb_start + offset + (page->index
-                               * (PAGE_SIZE/512))
+            if (rdev->sb_start + offset + index * PAGE_SECTORS
                  > rdev->data_offset
                  &&
                  rdev->sb_start + offset
@@ -247,7 +245,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
          } else if (offset < 0) {
              /* DATA  BITMAP METADATA  */
              if (offset
-                + (long)(page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512))
+                + (long)(index * PAGE_SECTORS)
                  + size/512 > 0)
                  /* bitmap runs in to metadata */
                  goto bad_alignment;
@@ -259,7 +257,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
              /* METADATA BITMAP DATA */
              if (rdev->sb_start
                  + offset
-                + page->index*(PAGE_SIZE/512) + size/512
+                + index * PAGE_SECTORS + size/512
                  > rdev->data_offset)
                  /* bitmap runs in to data */
                  goto bad_alignment;
@@ -268,7 +266,7 @@ static int write_sb_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
          }
          md_super_write(mddev, rdev,
                     rdev->sb_start + offset
-                   + page->index * (PAGE_SIZE/512),
+                   + index * PAGE_SECTORS,
                     size,
                     page);
      }
@@ -285,12 +283,13 @@ static void md_bitmap_file_kick(struct bitmap *bitmap);
  /*
   * write out a page to a file
   */
-static void write_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page, int wait)
+static void write_page(struct bitmap *bitmap, struct page *page,
+               unsigned long index, int wait)
  {
      struct buffer_head *bh;
      if (bitmap->storage.file == NULL) {
-        switch (write_sb_page(bitmap, page, wait)) {
+        switch (write_sb_page(bitmap, page, index, wait)) {
          case -EINVAL:
              set_bit(BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR, &bitmap->flags);
          }
@@ -399,7 +398,6 @@ static int read_page(struct file *file, unsigned long index,
          blk_cur++;
          bh = bh->b_this_page;
      }
-    page->index = index;
      wait_event(bitmap->write_wait,
             atomic_read(&bitmap->pending_writes)==0);
@@ -472,7 +470,7 @@ void md_bitmap_update_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)
      sb->sectors_reserved = cpu_to_le32(bitmap->mddev->
                         bitmap_info.space);
      kunmap_atomic(sb);
-    write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.sb_page, 1);
+    write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.sb_page, bitmap->storage.sb_index, 1);

I guess it is fine for sb_page now.

[...]

@@ -1027,7 +1024,7 @@ void md_bitmap_unplug(struct bitmap *bitmap)
                                "md bitmap_unplug");
              }
              clear_page_attr(bitmap, i, BITMAP_PAGE_PENDING);
-            write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.filemap[i], 0);
+            write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.filemap[i], i, 0);

But for filemap page, I am not sure the above is correct.

              writing = 1;
          }
      }
@@ -1137,7 +1134,7 @@ static int md_bitmap_init_from_disk(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t start)
                  memset(paddr + offset, 0xff,
                         PAGE_SIZE - offset);
                  kunmap_atomic(paddr);
-                write_page(bitmap, page, 1);
+                write_page(bitmap, page, index, 1);

Ditto.

                  ret = -EIO;
                  if (test_bit(BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR,
@@ -1336,7 +1333,7 @@ void md_bitmap_daemon_work(struct mddev *mddev)
          if (bitmap->storage.filemap &&
              test_and_clear_page_attr(bitmap, j,
                           BITMAP_PAGE_NEEDWRITE)) {
-            write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.filemap[j], 0);
+            write_page(bitmap, bitmap->storage.filemap[j], j, 0);

Ditto.


          }
      }
diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
index cfd7395de8..6e820eea32 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ struct bitmap {
                           * w/ filemap pages */
          unsigned long file_pages;    /* number of pages in the file*/
          unsigned long bytes;        /* total bytes in the bitmap */
+        unsigned long sb_index;        /* sb page index */

I guess it resolve the issue for sb_page, and we might need to do similar things
for filemap as well if I am not misunderstood.

Thanks,
Guoqing







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux