On 10/13/21 3:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: >> On 10/13/21 1:10 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> Side topic, what do you think about s/assigned/private for the "public" APIs, as >>> suggested/implied above? I actually like the terminology when talking specifically >>> about the RMP, but it doesn't fit the abstractions that tend to be used when talking >>> about these things in other contexts, e.g. in KVM. >> I can float the idea to see if docs folks is okay with the changes but >> generally speaking we all have been referring the assigned == private in >> the Linux SNP support patch. > Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything remotely close to an "official" change, it was > purely a suggestion for the host-side patches. It might even be unique to this > one helper. Ah, sure I am good with calling a private in the helper. -Brijesh
