On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:36 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue 12-10-21 17:58:21, Vasily Averin wrote:
> > Enable memory accounting for bulk page allocator.
>
> ENOCHANGELOG
>
> And I have to say I am not very happy about the solution. It adds a very
> tricky code where it splits different charging steps apart.
>
> Would it be just too inefficient to charge page-by-page once all pages
> are already taken away from the pcp lists? This bulk should be small so
> this shouldn't really cause massive problems. I mean something like
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index b37435c274cf..8bcd69195ef5 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5308,6 +5308,10 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
>
> local_unlock_irqrestore(&pagesets.lock, flags);
>
> + if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT)) {
> + /* charge pages here */
> + }
It is not that simple because __alloc_pages_bulk only allocate pages
for empty slots in the page_array provided by the caller.
The failure handling for post charging would be more complicated.
