On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 04:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 12:59:05PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Teach objtool to turn instrumentation required for memory barrier
> > modeling into nops in noinstr text.
> >
> > The __tsan_func_entry/exit calls are still emitted by compilers even
> > with the __no_sanitize_thread attribute. The memory barrier
> > instrumentation will be inserted explicitly (without compiler help), and
> > thus needs to also explicitly be removed.
>
> How is arm64 and others using kernel/entry + noinstr going to fix this?
>
> ISTR they fully rely on the compilers not emitting instrumentation,
> since they don't have objtool to fix up stray issues like this.
So this is where I'd like to hear if the approach of:
| #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR) || defined(CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION)
| ...
| #else
| #define kcsan_noinstr noinstr
| static __always_inline bool within_noinstr(unsigned long ip)
| {
| return (unsigned long)__noinstr_text_start <= ip &&
| ip < (unsigned long)__noinstr_text_end;
| }
| #endif
and then (using the !STACK_VALIDATION definitions)
| kcsan_noinstr void instrumentation_may_appear_in_noinstr(void)
| {
| if (within_noinstr(_RET_IP_))
| return;
works for the non-x86 arches that select ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR.
If it doesn't I can easily just remove kcsan_noinstr/within_noinstr, and
add a "depends on !ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR || STACK_VALIDATION" to the
KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY option.
Looking at a previous discussion [1], however, I was under the
impression that this would work.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANpmjNMAZiW-Er=2QDgGP+_3hg1LOvPYcbfGSPMv=aR6MVTB-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
